Alternate title: “The Problem With Supernatural Explanations”
People often tell me “science can’t prove that God does not exist, because you can’t prove a negative”. How often?
Ok, it’s really not that often.
It’s said that you can’t prove a negative because you can’t exhaustively examine and eliminate every place in the universe, so you can’t be 100% certain that something does not exist. Interestingly enough, however, the claim that “you can’t prove a negative” is itself an unrestricted negative. It effectively says “there are no proofs of unrestricted negatives”. If so, then no one can prove that no one can prove an unrestricted negative. And if no one can prove that no one can prove an unrestricted negative, then it must be logically possible to prove an unrestricted negative. The claim is self-refuting.
It should not only be possible to prove a negative, but I intend to show that a number of them have already been proven.