Jane Manning James: Latter-day Saint and servant

In the spirit of Black History Month, I want to give a quick biographical sketch of Jane Manning James, an early black convert to Mormonism. Jane joined the LDS Church in 1843 at the age of 21. That year, she and eight other black Mormons walked 800 miles to Nauvoo, where the bulk of the church was then located.

For their time, early Mormons were actually quite progressive on the matter of race. Joseph Smith, for example, ordained several black males to the priesthood (the black priesthood ban wasn’t fully articulated or enforced until Brigham Young became president). Many early Saints also had abolitionist sympathies, and the fear that Mormons wanted to free slaves is partly why the church was driven out of Missouri. And when Smith ran for president of the United States in 1844, he campaigned on a platform of abolition. Appreciating this context, it’s not hard to see how these black members might have felt welcome among the Saints.

When Jane arrived in Nauvoo, she was directed to Joseph Smith’s Mansion House. There, they were shown extraordinary hospitality, and Jane even lived with Smith for some time. Shortly before Joseph Smith was murdered in 1844, Emma Smith extended an invitation to Jane to be sealed to the Smith family as an adopted daughter. Flattered, but unsure what exactly the offer meant, she declined—a decision that would prove to be a life-long regret. More about that soon.

Continue reading

Elder Packer criticizes liberal, atheist USU professors

In 1973, Elder Boyd K. Packer spoke to Utah State University graduates about the corrosive influence of liberals and atheists in academia. Granted, this isn’t news (as my title might suggest). But it is news to me. I just recently stumbled about this talk, and I’d like to share it.

(What follows is an abbreviated version of the talk. Here is the full text.)

Standards have changed much in our universities. Through the influence of a few, restrictions on dormitory living have been pulled down. Standards have been abandoned in favor of coeducational living in university housing.

New courses are being introduced in many universities, under the general heading “Alternatives to Marriage.” Some of those alternatives, if accepted, would give our communities kinship with the ancient cities of Sodom and Gomorrah.

The trend sees enrollments declining, endowments withheld (some withdrawn), a loss of confidence in our system of higher education, and worse than that, the graduates from many institutions of higher learning are moving into private and public life well-trained, technically proficient, even talented, but somehow without that attribute of character called integrity.

Continue reading

My review of Daymon Smith’s The Book of Mammon

Luke 16:13 reads:

No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

This admonition hasn’t stopped the LDS Church from trying however. Anthropologist Daymon Smith, in The Book of Mammon, contends that the LDS Church tries to serve both God and mammon, prophet and profit. The result is an organization that is too corporate to be truly religious, and too religious to be truly corporate (members’ deference to ‘inspired’ church leaders makes competition and accountability difficult).

(What follows is my brief review of the book. I’d encourage you to read these more thorough reviews.)

The book recounts Daymon Smith’s experiences in the Church Office Building, where he worked as a media evaluator. Daymon gives us a rare inside-look into the church’s business practices, day-to-day operations, and office politics. Thread throughout the book are fascinating anecdotes about Mormon history and astute insights about Mormonism more generally.

Continue reading

Vote now in the 2010 Brodie Awards

The SHAFT blog has been nominated in six categories in this year’s Brodie Awards. Last year, we won two Brodies–one for “Best Humor Piece”, and the other for “Best New Blog”.

Here are this year’s nominated SHAFT posts and their respective categories:

LDS leader look-a-likes — “Funniest Humor Piece”

My bishop: “Masturbation leads to homosexuality” — “Best Chat with Church Leader”

BYU censors letter to the editor critical of Prop 8 — “Best News Reporting”

My apology to Pastor Ted Haggard — “Best Religion-and-Homosexuality Discussion”

This is your brain on god — “Best Science Piece”

Gordon B. Hinckley and the downplaying of Mormon peculiarity — “Best LDS Church Watch”

We are winning in four of those categories, and are competitive in the other two. Please consider voting not only for this site, but for all the other Mormon/ex-Mormon blogs you wish to recognize.

Vote here, and vote soon.

Thanks again for your continued support.

Am I anti-Mormon?

This question has been handled more exhaustively by other bloggers, but I want to take a stab at it. The question is personal to me, because I have occasionally been accused of anti-Mormonism (with this blog being cited as evidence).

In a recent Facebook discussion about racial insensitivity in the Book of Mormon, one of my cousins called me a “confused” and “angry” apostate. He said this site is “one-sided”, and full of “half-truths” and “war room spin.” My immediate family and several LDS friends came to my defense, saying that they’ve always found me sincere, well-meaning, and respectful. But I suspect that many others who read that Facebook thread quietly agreed with my cousin. So in this post, I hope to explain why I blog about and criticize Mormonism. Then we’ll discuss whether I satisfy the definition (or rather, definitions) of anti-Mormon.

My first project at this blog was the “Why I Don’t Believe” series. I anticipated people dismissing it as anti-Mormon, so I began the series with an explanation of my motives. I’ll quote them here, because they also apply to why I blog about Mormonism more generally.

Continue reading

The 2010 Brodie Awards!

Main Street Plaza’s second annual Brodie Awards are upon us. The Brodie Awards are to recognize the best of the Mormon/ex-Mormon blogosphere. Last year, the SHAFT blog won two Brodies—one for ‘Best New Blog’, and the other for ‘Best Humor Piece.’ I’d like to see our blog have a strong show in this year’s competition as well.

Please nominate your favorite SHAFT posts here. Earlier, I shared a list of my favorite 15 posts.

Thanks for your support!

Can Mormons accept evolution?

A 2009 Pew Research survey found that Mormons are more skeptical of evolution than any other religious demographic save Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Despite this widespread anti-evolution sentiment within the LDS Church, some Mormons claim that their faith and evolution can be reconciled. BYU biologists uniformly accept evolution as a fact, for instance. And several Mormon bloggers, too, have expressed and explained their belief in evolution. So obviously Mormons can believe in evolution. But given LDS teachings, should they?

Continue reading