Interesting survey of philosophers

PhilPapers, an online directory of academic philosophy articles. Last November, PhilPapers conducted a survey of 1803 philosophy faculty members and/or PhDs. Because many of our readers are interested in philosophy, I’ve provided the preliminary findings below:

A priori knowledge: yes or no?

Accept or lean toward: yes 1238 / 1803 (68.6%)
Accept or lean toward: no 389 / 1803 (21.5%)
Other 176 / 1803 (9.7%)

Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism?

Accept or lean toward: nominalism 736 / 1803 (40.8%)
Accept or lean toward: Platonism 655 / 1803 (36.3%)
Other 412 / 1803 (22.8%)

Aesthetic value: objective or subjective?

Accept or lean toward: objective 730 / 1803 (40.4%)
Accept or lean toward: subjective 653 / 1803 (36.2%)
Other 420 / 1803 (23.2%)

Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no?

Accept or lean toward: yes 1115 / 1803 (61.8%)
Accept or lean toward: no 517 / 1803 (28.6%)
Other 171 / 1803 (9.4%)

Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism?

Accept or lean toward: externalism 788 / 1803 (43.7%)
Other 543 / 1803 (30.1%)
Accept or lean toward: internalism 472 / 1803 (26.1%)

External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism?

Accept or lean toward: non-skeptical realism 1382 / 1803 (76.6%)
Other 170 / 1803 (9.4%)
Accept or lean toward: skepticism 128 / 1803 (7%)
Accept or lean toward: idealism 123 / 1803 (6.8%)

Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will?

Accept or lean toward: compatibilism 1004 / 1803 (55.6%)
Accept or lean toward: libertarianism 301 / 1803 (16.6%)
Other 265 / 1803 (14.6%)
Accept or lean toward: no free will 233 / 1803 (12.9%)

God: theism or atheism?

Accept or lean toward: atheism 1257 / 1803 (69.7%)
Accept or lean toward: theism 295 / 1803 (16.3%)
Other 251 / 1803 (13.9%)

Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism?

Accept or lean toward: contextualism 749 / 1803 (41.5%)
Accept or lean toward: invariantism 528 / 1803 (29.2%)
Other 453 / 1803 (25.1%)
Accept or lean toward: relativism 73 / 1803 (4%)

Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism?

Accept or lean toward: empiricism 687 / 1803 (38.1%)
Other 647 / 1803 (35.8%)
Accept or lean toward: rationalism 469 / 1803 (26%)

Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean?

Accept or lean toward: non-Humean 919 / 1803 (50.9%)
Accept or lean toward: Humean 521 / 1803 (28.8%)
Other 363 / 1803 (20.1%)

Logic: classical or non-classical?

Accept or lean toward: classical 874 / 1803 (48.4%)
Other 609 / 1803 (33.7%)
Accept or lean toward: non-classical 320 / 1803 (17.7%)

Mental content: internalism or externalism?

Accept or lean toward: externalism 882 / 1803 (48.9%)
Other 520 / 1803 (28.8%)
Accept or lean toward: internalism 401 / 1803 (22.2%)

Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism?

Accept or lean toward: moral realism 1017 / 1803 (56.4%)
Accept or lean toward: moral anti-realism 511 / 1803 (28.3%)
Other 275 / 1803 (15.2%)

Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism?

Accept or lean toward: naturalism 912 / 1803 (50.5%)
Accept or lean toward: non-naturalism 474 / 1803 (26.2%)
Other 417 / 1803 (23.1%)

Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism?

Accept or lean toward: physicalism 981 / 1803 (54.4%)
Accept or lean toward: non-physicalism 521 / 1803 (28.8%)
Other 301 / 1803 (16.6%)

Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism?

Accept or lean toward: cognitivism 1132 / 1803 (62.7%)
Accept or lean toward: non-cognitivism 340 / 1803 (18.8%)
Other 331 / 1803 (18.3%)

Moral motivation: internalism or externalism?

Accept or lean toward: internalism 654 / 1803 (36.2%)
Other 620 / 1803 (34.3%)
Accept or lean toward: externalism 529 / 1803 (29.3%)

Newcomb’s problem: one box or two boxes?

Other 997 / 1803 (55.2%)
Accept or lean toward: two boxes 458 / 1803 (25.4%)
Accept or lean toward: one box 348 / 1803 (19.3%)

Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics?

Other 558 / 1803 (30.9%)
Accept or lean toward: consequentialism 435 / 1803 (24.1%)
Accept or lean toward: virtue ethics 406 / 1803 (22.5%)
Accept or lean toward: deontology 404 / 1803 (22.4%)

Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory?

Other 740 / 1803 (41%)
Accept or lean toward: representationalism 523 / 1803 (29%)
Accept or lean toward: qualia theory 240 / 1803 (13.3%)
Accept or lean toward: disjunctivism 221 / 1803 (12.2%)
Accept or lean toward: sense-datum theory 79 / 1803 (4.3%)

Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view?

Other 646 / 1803 (35.8%)
Accept or lean toward: psychological view 620 / 1803 (34.3%)
Accept or lean toward: biological view 325 / 1803 (18%)
Accept or lean toward: further-fact view 212 / 1803 (11.7%)

Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism?

Other 672 / 1803 (37.2%)
Accept or lean toward: egalitarianism 595 / 1803 (33%)
Accept or lean toward: communitarianism 294 / 1803 (16.3%)
Accept or lean toward: libertarianism 242 / 1803 (13.4%)

Proper names: Fregean or Millian?

Other 694 / 1803 (38.4%)
Accept or lean toward: Millian 558 / 1803 (30.9%)
Accept or lean toward: Fregean 551 / 1803 (30.5%)

Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism?

Accept or lean toward: scientific realism 1264 / 1803 (70.1%)
Accept or lean toward: scientific anti-realism 287 / 1803 (15.9%)
Other 252 / 1803 (13.9%)

Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death?

Accept or lean toward: survival 626 / 1803 (34.7%)
Other 610 / 1803 (33.8%)
Accept or lean toward: death 567 / 1803 (31.4%)

Time: A-theory or B-theory?

Other 1107 / 1803 (61.3%)
Accept or lean toward: B-theory 408 / 1803 (22.6%)
Accept or lean toward: A-theory 288 / 1803 (15.9%)

Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don’t switch?

Accept or lean toward: switch 1191 / 1803 (66%)
Other 482 / 1803 (26.7%)
Accept or lean toward: don’t switch 130 / 1803 (7.2%)

Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic?

Accept or lean toward: correspondence 882 / 1803 (48.9%)
Accept or lean toward: deflationary 415 / 1803 (23%)
Other 310 / 1803 (17.1%)
Accept or lean toward: epistemic 196 / 1803 (10.8%)

Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible?

Accept or lean toward: conceivable but not metaphysically possible 631 / 1803 (34.9%)
Accept or lean toward: metaphysically possible 434 / 1803 (24%)
Other 420 / 1803 (23.2%)
Accept or lean toward: inconceivable 318 / 1803 (17.6%)
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged by Jon Adams. Bookmark the permalink.

About Jon Adams

I have my bachelors in sociology and political science, having recently graduated from Utah State University. I co-founded SHAFT, but have also been active in the College Democrats and the Religious Studies Club. I was born in Utah to a loving LDS family. I left Mormonism in high school after discovering some disconcerting facts about its history. Like many ex-Mormons, I am now an agnostic atheist. I am amenable to being wrong, however. So should you disagree with me about religion (or anything, really), please challenge me. I welcome and enjoy a respectful debate. I love life, and am thankful for those things and people that make life worth loving: my family, my friends, my dogs, German rock, etc. Contact: jon.earl.adams@gmail.com

2 thoughts on “Interesting survey of philosophers

  1. Very interesting Jon, thanks for posting. I have two questions, however.

    1) I find the comparison between the God question and the Mind question quite intriguing. The 16% gap between those who identify as Atheists (70%) and Physicalism (54%) is surprising to me. That gap is completely represented in the Mind-Other category. However, without belief in a soul, what’s left for the “Others”? Emergent Determinism? That’s still Physicalism in my opinion. Some sort of Quantum Theory of the Mind? Either way, I would have thought those two answers would have correlated much closer to each other than what’s actually represented.

    2) I’m not a philosophy major by any means, so I need some help. What “Other” option is actually available in the Trolley Question? In its simplest form, I always thought the answer had to be mutually exclusive? One or the other? I guess I was wrong! Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>