Review: The Development of LDS Temple Worship

I am currently reading Devery Anderson’s The Development of LDS Temple Worship. The highly-anticipated book came out in March and has already made significant contributions to Mormon studies.

The book is a documentary history comprised of official LDS documents and church leaders’ personal writings spanning 1846 to 2000. The fact that the book pulls from these official sources is both its strength and weakness. Because it avoids non-Mormon/ex-Mormon sources, it doesn’t read like an angry polemic or exposé. On the other hand, because we only get the LDS leadership perspective, we a get a limited view of the temple ceremonies.

The title, The Development of LDS Temple Worship, is actually a bit of a misnomer. The book isn’t concerned so much about temple worship as it is temple policies. And to the extent that the book discusses temple worship, it’s always sensitive not to disclose those aspects that Mormons hold sacred. If you’re more interested in the particulars of the temple ceremonies, I’d recommend David Buerger’s Mysteries of Godliness.

I don’t intend for this post to suffice as a review of Anderson’s book; better ones have already been written. Rather, much like my review of The Book of Mammon, I just want to share some interesting anecdotes from the book:

Continue reading

My Testimony: A Response to Bruce D. Porter.

Last fall in one of my graduate seminars we were discussing a reading by a scholar by the name of Bruce D. Porter who was a respected, published scholar from BYU in political science and international affairs. My professor remarked that he didn’t know what had happened to Porter because he had stopped publishing and “disappeared”; well apparently Bruce D. Porter is an LDS general authority these days in the Quorum of the Seventy. In the June issue of The Ensign (a monthly magazine of the LDS Church containing talks, columns, and stories from church leaders that members are encouraged to read as part of their regular scripture study) Porter has an article entitled “Defending the Family in a Troubled World.”

It is not surprising that a man who has a PhD in political science from Harvard and who built his career as a researcher and professor in that field would have opinions on one of the most pressing social and political issues of this generation. And let me be clear, my purpose here is not to, as some have written, contend that the article in the Ensign was in poor taste or out of place for a publication that some members believe to be modern scripture. Porter is entitled to voice his opinions whether I agree with them or not.

My purpose is to confront the CONTENT of what was said. Porter is a smart man who, regardless of what he says over any pulpit or in any religious publication, truly knows that by exercising his right to free speech and free expression he is not free from critique by those who exercise their free speech with opposing views and that such critiques do not constitute any form of bigotry or persecution—for he built his career in a field (academia) that does not survive without critique.

Continue reading

Why I like (most) LDS temples

Few things serve as a starker reminder of Mormonism’s near omnipresence in Utah than the 14 temples that dot our state’s landscape. The Salt Lake temple, as the church’s flagship temple, casts the longest shadow. And because a lot of ex-Mormons and non-Mormons here don’t like living in that shadow, the Salt Lake temple for them almost takes on a menacing visage (the fact that it resembles a fortress doesn’t help).

But I have a confession to make: For the most part, I actually like the temples. Admittedly, I sometimes get the creeps from the Salt Lake temple. Perhaps it’s just too synonymous with the LDS Church’s inordinate influence in Utah. Otherwise, I’m able to divorce the temples from Mormonism and appreciate them as architectural works and landmarks.

Continue reading

Perception vs reality

This morning I ran across a column from the Trib called “Life in Mormon ads not consistent with reality.” The comments on the piece seem to split between agreeing with the writer and saying that she clearly has not gotten out of Utah or gotten to know her fellow church members very well.

The thing, I think, is that both camps are right. Not only are church members typically a little more diverse outside of the Book of Mormon belt, but I personally know a hugely varied range of people who are LDS church members. Not only do they have many different takes on their own religion, but their hobbies, careers, looks, race and everything else run the gamut.

BUT.

I also think the sort of people I attract as friends are semi-atypical of Mormons. While the people within the church may have individual lives, the capital-C Church has worked very hard for the last 40 years to create uniformity. The Mormons may have started out as a rag-tag bunch of trailblazers, but the implementation of correlation created personal conformity in addition to doctrinal conformity. From the top down a very conservative personal dress and lifestyle is encouraged. Many members feel pressure from leaders and doctrine to look and act a certain way, and (particularly in my area) any deviation from that is met with judgment from friends, neighbors and fellow congregants. Watch an R-rated movie? Expect a few whispers. Grow a beard? Better hope you don’t get called into the bishopric. Feel like you, as a woman, should work outside the home? God give you strength to deal with people telling you how you are hurting your family.* So members stay in line to stay in good standing with the church and because it is culturally reinforced.

I think this video kind of says it all. The church is trying to attract ever more diverse populations with a uniform, conservative message. But most church members I know deviate from that norm, at least somewhat. (Hell, my best friend is planning on getting dreads this summer!) So where is the truth on this issue? Does the new ad campaign reflect the reality of LDS membership, even if it doesn’t reflect the reality of correlation? Do I just know unusual Mormons? Or is the whole issue just shades of gray? Thoughts?

*Many of these are becoming more accepted and recent talks from church leadership have softened pronouncements on such issues as birth control, working moms and other divisive issues, but there are still a lot of traditional expectations for members.

Mormonism: a definition through contradiction

The following is a paper I wrote for a class in 2008. It was among my first forays into Mormon studies, and my understanding of Mormonism has evolved slightly since then. Still, I hope the paper yields a few insights—at least enough to excuse its length!

Mormonism is a religion colored by complexities and contradictions. The prolific Mormon essayist Eugene England called the Mormon experience “essentially, as well as existentially, paradoxical.” LDS author Terryl Givens, more recently, posits a similar thesis in his book People of Paradox.

“By proving contraries, truth is made manifest,” said Joseph Smith, the founding prophet of the LDS Church. Informed by Smith’s statement, I will discuss Mormonism’s contraries in the hope of explaining the religion. My method in this paper will follow the seven Cs of religious studies: creed, code, cultus, community, culture, confines, and consciousness. In each of these seven characteristics exist tensions that help define Mormonism.

One of the most important aspects of a religion is its creed—its set of core beliefs. The Mormon “creed,” as it were, can be found in the Articles of Faith. Joseph Smith penned a letter to the inquiring John Wentworth, editor of the Chicago Democrat, articulating 13 fundamental doctrines of Mormonism. The letter was later canonized as the Articles of Faith.

The primary articles affirm the church’s belief in: God, Christ, and the Holy Ghost; free moral agency and accountability for one’s actions; the salvation of man through the Atonement and “by obedience to the laws and ordinances [faith, repentance, baptism by immersion, and the laying on of hands] of the Gospel”; the Bible “as far as it is translated correctly” and the Book of Mormon as scripture; continuing revelation; and the Restoration of the Primitive Church.

Continue reading

The LDS Church removes racial BoM chapter headings

From the Salt Lake Tribune today:

The LDS Church has made subtle—but significant—changes to chapter headings in its online version of the faith’s signature scripture, The Book of Mormon, toning down some earlier racial allusions.

The words “skin of blackness” were removed from the introductory italicized summary in 2 Nephi, Chapter 5, in describing the “curse” God put on disbelieving Lamanites.

Deeper into the volume, in Mormon, Chapter 5, the heading changes from calling Lamanites “a dark, filthy, and loathsome people” to “because of their unbelief, the Lamanites will be scattered, and the Spirit will cease to strive with them.”

This isn’t the first change to the Book of Mormon. There have been thousands of changes, most of them minor, since its first publication in 1830. In 1981, a verse claiming that repentant Lamanites will become “white and delightsome” was changed to “pure and delightsome” (which is actually what the phrase was in the 1840 edition).  And more recently, the church edited the introduction to the Book of Mormon to read that Native Americans are “among the principal ancestors” of the Lamanites instead of being “the principal ancestors.”

Continue reading

The 2010 Church Handbook of Instructions on homosexuality

Many thanks to Project Mayhem for bringing these changes from the 2006 Church Handbook of Instructions to the 2010 version to my attention (deletions in strikeout, additions in italics):

Homosexual behavior violates the commandments of God, is contrary to the purposes of human sexuality, distorts loving relationships, and deprives people of the blessings that can be found in family life and in the saving ordinances of the gospel. Those who persist in such behavior or who influence others to do so are subject to Church discipline. Homosexual behavior can be forgiven through sincere repentance.

If members have homosexual thoughts or feelings or engage in homosexual behavior, Church leaders should help them have a clear understanding of faith in Jesus Christ, the process of repentance, and the purpose of life on earth. Leaders also should help them accept responsibility for their thoughts and actions and apply gospel principles in their lives.

Continue reading

Sisters in Zion

I’m a feminist. Not a bra-burning, perpetually angry feminist, just the garden-variety “equal pay for equal work, nobody grope anybody else in the workplace” kind of feminist. You know, the lazy kind.

Still, a feminist, is a feminist, is a feminist, which is why even I’m not sure how it took me so long to get flustered at the LDS church over its doctrines concerning women. I suppose I was fairly placated and passive until I started learning more about Brigham Young, but we’ll get to that in a minute.

I remember sitting in a primary class and asking why women didn’t have the priesthood. I received the very enthusiastic response “Because they don’t need it!” This idea was based around the belief of a woman’s divine status being obtained through bearing and rearing children. Here is the idea most of us were raised with (in one form or another) in the LDS Church:

By divine design, fathers are to preside over their families in love and righteousness and are responsible to provide the necessities of life and protection for their families. Mothers are primarily responsible for the nurture of their children. In these sacred responsibilities, fathers and mothers are obligated to help one another as equal partners. – “The Family: A Proclamation to the World”

This is a warm fuzzy replacement for a doctrine from Brigham Young that isn’t quoted in the 2010 lesson manuals:

“True there is a curse upon the woman that is not upon the man, namely, that ‘her whole affections shall be towards her husband,’ and what is the next? ‘He shall rule over you.” – Journal of Discourses, Vol. 4, Sept 21, 1856

Continue reading